Skip to main content

Airtel Voda Idea minimum recharge to active

This morning I woke up and found that my unlimited monthly package has expired, I thought no worry I still got some balance on my main account, will do recharge in a couple of days. Just to check the balance, I dialwd *123# and found that my main balance is also going to expire in 3 days, that's strange. I was under an impression that it is for life time at least till 2020 or 2021.

This is something which company claimed when I used to recharge earlier that balance is with lifetime validity. That's a direct case of cheating with customers.

Even this happened with my earlier Idea number, where my outgoing services were stopped due to the fact that I didn't had enough minimum balance on account.

The main reasons I found that these companies have immense pressure to improve Average revenue per user.

But to do that, changing policies and refusal from what promised earlier is not at all ethical way to doing.

I am more worry about the people in village who own a mobile and a SIM for sake of emergency only, and those people now need to subscribe for minimum recharge of 28 days. Even it is not 30 on an average. 365 divided by 28 is 13, that means they need to do at least Rs. 455 recharge on annual basis. Not only villagers, it goes with all consumers, if they own a SIM now, to continue using services, they need to shed atleast 455 annually.

I am afraid what TRAI is doing on these policies of companies. All the bank account, and many apps are getting linked with these numbers, the mobile company shouldn't threat people for discontinue of service on the sake of minimum subscription policy.

If speaking about government company like BSNL, they couldn't able to build a strong trust on their network.

Further more these policy might give a little push in revenue collection but will definitely reduce ARPU in long run.

Company shall make an environment before of trust with consumers and talking about normal Indian phycology, even rupee lost without a reason start a sense of distrust with us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Suggested answers November 2018 - Advance accounting Old Course IPCC

November 2018 Following are answers, a care is taken to answer them correctly, however, if any mistakes are identified by you, kindly share with me, I would love to hear them and will incorporate changes accordingly. Question Covered in post 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), 1(d), 2, 3(a),  3(b), 4, 5(a), 5(b),  6(b), 7(a), 7(b), 7(c),  7(d), 7(e) Question Pending 6(a) 1(a) (i) Annual lease rent = Rs. 32,500 (ii) Income = 26,000, 32,500, 39,000 (iii) Depreciation = Rs. 20,000, Rs. 25,000, Rs. 30,000 1(b) (i) Prior period Item adjustment Prior Period A/c Dr. To Salary Payable Salary payable A/c Dr To Cash Prior period item shall be disclosed separately (ii) Wages with retrospective effect It is not taken as error or omission in the preparation of Financial statements and hence this is not a prior period item, additional liability of Rs. 75,000 shall be included in current year Salary 1(c) (i) Present obligation as a r...

Suggested answers May 2019 - Strategic Financial Management

Theory 7 (a) Credit rating is a very important indicator for prudence but it suffers from certain limitations. Some of the limitations are: (i) Conflict of Interest – The rating agency collects fees from the entity it rates leading to a conflict of interest. Since the rating market is very competitive, there is a distant possibility of such conflict entering into the rating system. (ii) Industry Specific rather than Company Specific – Downgrades are linked to industry rather than company performance. Agencies give importance to macro aspects and not to micro ones; overreact to existing conditions which come from optimistic / pessimistic views arising out of up / down turns. At times, value judgments are not ruled out. (iii) Rating Changes – Ratings given to instruments can change over a period of time. They have to be kept under constant watch. Downgrading of an instrument may not be timely enough to keep investors educated over such matters. (iv) Corporate Governance Issu...

Suggested answer May 2019 - Audit and Assurance

Both Old and New Course Answer NEW 1 (a) Incorrect - Where the firm is appointed as the auditor, the report is signed in the personal name of the auditor and in the name of the audit firm. (b) Correct - The existence of a satisfactory control environment can be a positive factor when the auditor assesses the risks of material misstatement. However, although it may help reduce the risk of fraud, a satisfactory control environment is not an absolute deterrent to fraud. (c) Incorrect - Hold office till the conclusion of the AGM (d) Incorrect - A joint auditor is not bound by the views of the majority of the joint auditors regarding matters to be covered in the report and should express his opinion in a separate report in case of a disagreement. (e) Incorrect  - The auditor of a banking company is to be appointed at the annual general meeting of the shareholders, whereas the auditor of a nationalised bank is to be appointed by the bank concerned acting through its...