Skip to main content

Suggested answers CA Final November 2020 Advance audit

Answers of old course paper and new course will be updated here.

New Paper analysis 

1(a) SA 501 

1(b) SA 560 

1(c) SA 720 

2(a) SA 550 

2(b) NFRA Rules, 2018 

2(c) 2.I.2 and 2.I.7 

3(a) Classification of advances and provisioning 

3(b) SA 265 3

(c) 2.II.1 

4(a) SA 250 

4(b) Auditor's procedure to verify completeness of information CFS 

4(c) Para 3 Clause (xiii) 

5(a) Solution to Behavioral problem 

5(b) Regulation 19 LODR 

5(c) 1.I.6 PE Or Audit in IT environment/SA 315 

6(a) Audit of NBFC 

6(b) SA 240 

6(c) Data mining technique - Forensic audit 

New Course answers


1 (a) For practical reasons, the physical inventory counting may be conducted at a date, or dates, other than the date of the financial statements. This may be done irrespective of whether management determines inventory quantities by an annual physical inventory counting or maintains a perpetual inventory system. In either case, the effectiveness of the design, implementation and maintenance of controls over changes in inventory determines whether the conduct of physical inventory counting at a date, or dates, other than the date of the financial statements is appropriate for audit purposes. SA 330 establishes requirements and provides guidance on substantive procedures performed at an interim date5.

Where a perpetual inventory system is maintained, management may perform physical counts or other tests to ascertain the reliability of inventory quantity information included in the entity’s perpetual inventory records. In some cases, management or the auditor may identify differences between the perpetual inventory records and actual physical inventory quantities on hand; this may indicate that the controls over changes in inventory are not operating effectively.

Relevant matters for consideration when designing audit procedures to obtain audit evidence about whether changes in inventory amounts between the count date, or dates, and the final inventory records are properly recorded include:

• Whether the perpetual inventory records are properly adjusted.

• Reliability of the entity’s perpetual inventory records.

• Reasons for significant differences between the information obtained during the physical count and the perpetual inventory records.

2 (a) 

Understanding the nature of significant transactions outside the normal course of business (Ref: Para. 16(a))

Inquiring into the nature of the significant transactions outside the entity’s normal course of business involves obtaining an understanding of the business rationale of the transactions, and the terms and conditions under which these have been entered into. Inquiring into whether related parties could be involved

A related party could be involved in a significant transaction outside the entity’s normal course of business not only by directly influencing the transaction through being a party to the transaction, but also by indirectly influencing it through an intermediary. Such influence may indicate the presence of a fraud risk factor.

Relevant related party information that may be shared among the engagement team members includes, for example:

• The identity of the entity’s related parties.

• The nature of the related party relationships and transactions.

• Significant or complex related party relationships or transactions that may require special audit consideration, in particular transactions in which management or those charged with governance are financially involved.

2 (b)

Rule 3 applicability to file NFRA-1 covers:
- Insurance companies (LIC, , Reliance Life Insurance, Sahara Life Insurance, – not registered under Companies Act, 2013)
- Banking companies (SBI, PNB,UCO, SBOP etc.- not registered under Companies Act, 2013)
- Companies engaged in the generation or supply of electricity,
- Companies governed by any special Act for the time being in force (ICSI, ICAI) or
- Bodies corporate incorporated by an Act in accordance with clauses (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) of sub-section (4) of section 1 of the Act;

2 (c) 

Clause (7) of Part I of Second

Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he does not exercise due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties . As it appears from the facts of the case, the auditor has been grossly negligent in performing his duties which constitutes professional misconduct. Thus, such instances require reference to Disciplinary Committee of the Council of the Institute. If a member is found guilty by the Council of any of the acts or omissions stated in the Schedule, its finding with recommendations are to be referred to the High Court for decision.

3(a)


• Examine whether the classification made by the branch is appropriate. Particularly, examine the classification of advances where there are threats to recovery.

• Examine whether the secured and the unsecured portions of advances have been segregated correctly and provisions have been calculated properly.

As per the Reserve Bank guidelines, if an account has been regularised before the balance sheet date by payment of overdue amount through genuine sources, the account need not be treated as NPA. Where, subsequent to repayment by the borrower (which makes the account regular), the branch has provided further funds to the borrower (including by way of subscription to its debentures or in other accounts of the borrower), the auditor should carefully assess whether the repayment was out of genuine sources or not. Where the account indicates inherent weakness based on the data available, the account should be deemed as a NPA. In other genuine cases, the banks must furnish satisfactory evidence to the Statutory Auditors about the manner of regularisation of the account to eliminate doubts on their performing status. It is to be ensured that the classification is made as per the position as on date and hence classification of all standard accounts be reviewed as on balance sheet date. The date of NPA is significant to determine the classification and hence specific care be taken in this regard. NPA should be recognized only based on concept of Past Due/ Overdue concept, and not based on the Balance Sheet date.

3 (b)

Examples of matters that the auditor may consider in determining whether a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control constitutes a significant deficiency include:

● The likelihood of the deficiencies leading to material misstatements in the financial statements in the future.

● The susceptibility to loss or fraud of the related asset or liability.

● The subjectivity and complexity of determining estimated amounts, such as fair value accounting estimates.

● The financial statement amounts exposed to the deficiencies.

● The volume of activity that has occurred or could occur in the account balance or class of transactions exposed to the deficiency or deficiencies.

3 (c)

UDIN is applicable for both manual as well as digitally signed certificates, for online certificate, UDIN has to be generated and kept for records if asked by third party or authority.

5 (a)

Solution to behavioural problems: The following steps may be taken to overcome the aforesaid problems-

(i) To demonstrate that audit is part of an overall programme of review for protective and constructive benefit.

(ii) To demonstrate the objective of review is to provide maximum service in all feasible managerial dimensions.

(iii) To demonstrate the review will be with minimum interference with regular operation.

(iv) The responsible officers will be involved in the process of review of the findings and recommendations before the audit report is formally released.

It is essential to create an atmosphere of trust and friendliness so that audit reports will be understood in their proper perspective. Finally, it needs hardly any emphasis that there should be right management culture, enlightened auditees and auditors of the right calibre. May be to expect a combination at all times of all the three is asking for the impossible. But, a concerted effort by the management, auditors and auditees to achieve a more acceptable climate would go a long way to achieve the goal


Old Course answers

1 (b) General Steps in the Conduct of RBA - RBA consists of four main phases starting with the identification and prioritization of risks, to the determination of residual risk, reduction of residual risk to acceptable level and the reporting to auditee of audit results. These are achieved through the following:

Step 1 Understand auditee operations to identify and prioritize risks: Understanding auditee operations involves processes for reviewing and understanding the audited organization’s risk management processes for its strategies, framework of operations, operational performance and information process framework, in order to identify and prioritize the error and fraud risks that impact the audit of financial statements. The environment in which the auditee operates, the information required to monitor changes in the environment, and the process or activities integral to the audited entity’s success in meeting its objectives are the key factors to an understanding of agency risks. Likewise, a performance review of the audited entity’s delivery of service by comparing expectations against actual results may also aid in understanding agency operations. 

Step 2 Assess auditee management strategies and controls to determine residual audit risk: Assessment of management risk strategies and controls is the determination as to how controls within the auditee are designed. The role of internal audit in promoting a sound accounting system and internal control is recognized, thus the SAI should evaluate the effectiveness of internal audit to determine the extent to which reliance can be placed upon it in the conduct of substantive tests.

Step 3 Manage residual risk to reduce it to acceptable level: Management of residual risk requires the design and execution of a risk reduction approach that is efficient and effective to bring down residual audit risk to an acceptable level. This includes the design and execution of necessary audit procedures and substantive testing to obtain evidence in support of transactions and balances. More resources should be allocated to areas of high audit risks, which were earlier known through the analytical procedures undertaken.

Step 4 Inform auditee of audit results through appropriate report: The results of audit shall be communicated by the auditor to the audited entity. The auditor must immediately communicate to the auditee reportable conditions that have been observed even before completion of the audit, such as weaknesses in the internal control system, deficiencies in the design and operation of internal controls that affect the organization’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data.


1(c) Personal Expenses Debited to Profit & Loss Account [Clause 21(a)] - Where payment is made to employees under a contractual obligation then it need not to be disclosed even if it is of personal nature.


2(a) Determining materiality involves the exercise of professional judgment. A percentage is often applied to a chosen benchmark as a starting point in determining materiality for the financial statements as a whole. Factors that may affect the identification of an appropriate benchmark include the following:

• The elements of the financial statements (for example, assets, liabilities, equity, revenue, expenses);

• Whether there are items on which the attention of the users of the particular entity’s financial statements tends to be focused (for example, for the purpose of evaluating financial performance users may tend to focus on profit, revenue or net assets);

• The nature of the entity, where the entity is at in its life cycle, and the industry and economic environment in which the entity operates;

• The entity’s ownership structure and the way it is financed (for example, if an entity is financed solely by debt rather than equity, users may put more emphasis on assets, and claims on them, than on the entity’s earnings); and

• The relative volatility of the benchmark.


2 (b) Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, commonly known as SOX, is a requirement in America. Section 404 of this act requires public listed companies to implement, assess and ensure effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and auditors independent opinion on the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) – which is similar to the requirements of IFC-FR for Indian companies. Similar legal and statutory requirements over internal controls exist in several other countries including Japan, China, European Countries, etc.


2 (c) General Locial question


3 (a) Risks can arise or change due to circumstances such as the following:

(a) Changes in operating environment. Changes in the regulatory or operating environment can result in changes in competitive pressures and significantly different risks.

(b) New personnel. New personnel may have a different focus on or understanding of internal control.

(c) New or revamped information systems. Significant and rapid changes in information systems can change the risk relating to internal control.

(d) Rapid growth. Significant and rapid expansion of operations can strain controls and increase the risk of a breakdown in controls.

(e) New technology. Incorporating new technologies into production processes or information systems may change the risk associated with internal control.

(f) New business models, products, or activities. Entering into business areas or transactions with which an entity has little experience may introduce new risks associated with internal control.

(g) Corporate restructurings. Restructurings may be accompanied by staff reductions and changes in supervision and segregation of duties that may change the risk associated with internal control.

(h) Expanded foreign operations. The expansion or acquisition of foreign operations carries new and often unique risks that may affect internal control, for example, additional or changed risks from foreign currency transactions.

(i) New accounting pronouncements. Adoption of new accounting principles or changing accounting principles may affect risks in preparing financial statements.


3 (b) Council Affairs 4th April, 2016 ANNOUNCEMENT - RESPONDING TO TENDERS

The matter pertaining to responding to tenders issued by various users of professional services or organization in areas exclusively reserved for the members of the Institute was recently considered by the Council of the Institute. The Council on a consideration of the matter has decided that –

a) In the exclusive areas of practice of Chartered Accountants, like audit and attestation services i.e. those areas where the assignments can be performed only by Chartered Accountants or where only Chartered Accountants have been invited for audit assignments, members should not respond to such tenders. In such cases, entities may avail the multipurpose empanelment data available with ICAI. However, wherever minimum fee of the assignment is prescribed in the tender document itself, members may participate in such tendering process.

b) In those areas, where along with Chartered Accountants, other professionals can also apply for the tender, there is no restriction for the Chartered Accountants to respond to the tenders floated by authorities from time to time.

The Council has further decided that its aforesaid decision be suitably issued as a guidelines of the Council under clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and any member who contravenes any of the provisions of the above guidelines shall be liable for disciplinary action under Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

While the guidelines of the Council on the above matter is being issued separately under clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, this Announcement is being issued for advance information of the members at large.
3 (c)

The auditor may decide not to send a new audit engagement letter or other written agreement each
period. However, the following factors may make it appropriate to revise the terms of the audit engagement or to remind the entity of existing terms:
● Any indication that the entity misunderstands the objective and scope of the audit.
● Any revised or special terms of the audit engagement.
● A recent change of senior management.
● A significant change in ownership.
● A significant change in nature or size of the entity’s business.
● A change in legal or regulatory requirements.
● A change in the financial reporting framework adopted in the preparation of the financial statements.
● A change in other reporting requirements.

4 (a) Going concern 

4 (b) Schedule II to the Act, provides that useful life of an asset shall not ordinarily be different from the useful life specified in Part ‘C’ to the said Schedule

The Schedule II to the Companies Act, 2013 needs disclosure in the financial statements about the
depreciation method used and the useful lives of the assets for computing depreciation, if they are
different from the life specified in the Schedule II.

Companies are allowed to follow different useful life/residual value if an appropriate justification is given supported by technical advice. 

4 (c) Limitation of scope

5 (a) Evaluation of Cost of Products: Clause (4) of Part I of the Second Schedule to Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, states that expressing an opinion on financial statements of any business or enterprise in which he, his firm or a partner in his firm has a substantial interest would constitute misconduct. Also, the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has stated that in cases where a member of the Institute is a director of a company, or the firm in which the said member is a partner, should not express any opinion on its financial statements. As per facts of the case, the firm has been retained to evaluate the cost of products manufactured by it for its information system. It is a part of management consultancy service of the firm and moreover its partner was on the Board. Hence, the firm can perform this assignment and it will not constitute misconduct. However, the firm while accepting the position as auditor in future would have to consider whether it would be possible to act in independent manner and express opinion on financial statements.

5 (b)

5 (c) 

6 (a) Auditor shall not provide access to working paper Clause 1 part 1 second scheudle, SA 200, 230, SQC 1

6 (b) Peer review selection process

6 (c)

In particular, this Ind AS requires: (a) assets that meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale to be measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell, and depreciation on such assets to cease; and (b) assets that meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale to be presented separately in the balance sheet and the results of discontinued operations to be presented separately in the statement of profit and loss.


Hints to MCQ 
- Co-Operative Societies Act, 1912, Contribution to charitable purpose

Any registered society may, with the sanction of the Registrar, after one-fourth of the net profits in any year has been carried to a reserve fund, contribute an amount not exceeding ten per cent. of the remaining net profits to any charitable purpose, as defined in section 2 of the Charitable Endowments Act, 1890

- In some cases, even an unsophisticated predictive model may be effective as an analytical procedure.

- Under comprehensive audit, the C&AG do not really cover again the field which has already been covered. He conducts an appraisal or an efficiency-cum-performance audit.

Old Paper analysis - Chennai


5 (a)

(i) Transfer to Reserve: Section 123(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that dividend cannot be declared or paid by a company for any financial year except out of profits of the company for that year arrived at after providing for depreciation in accordance with the provisions of Section 123(2), or out of the profits or the company for any previous financial year or years arrived at after providing for depreciation in the manner aforementioned and remaining undistributed, or out of both. 

However, the first proviso to section 123(1) of the said Act provides that a company may, before the declaration of any dividend in any financial year, transfer such percentage of its profit for that financial year as it may consider appropriate to the reserves of the company irrespective of the size of the declared dividend i.e. the company is not mandatorily required to transfer the profit to the reserves, it is an option available to the company to transfer such percentage.

In the instant case, KR Ltd. has proposed to pay a dividend of 20% on its equity shares and not transferring any profit to reserve, Therefore, from the above facts and provisions, it may be concluded that KR Ltd. is under no violation of law i.e. the company is free to transfer any amount of its profit to the reserves, without any compulsion or restriction, before declaration of any dividend.

(ii) 


5 (c) Review of Cost accounting record: This will include:

(i) Method of costing in use - batch, process or unit.
(ii) Method of accounting for raw materials; stores and spares, wastages, spoilage defectives, etc.
(iii) System of recording wages, salaries, overtime and spares, wastages, etc.
(iv) Basis of allocation of overheads to cost centres and of absorption by products an apportionment of service department’s expenses.
(v) Treatment of interest, recording of royalties, research and development expenses, etc.
(vi) Method of accounting of depreciation.
(vii) Method of inventory-taking and its valuation including inventory policies.
(viii) System of budgetary control.
(ix) System of internal auditing.

6.a.

Compliance audit is the independent assessment of whether a given subject matter is in compliance with the applicable authorities identified as criteria. This audit is carried out by assessing whether activities, financial transactions and information comply in all material respects, with the regulatory and other authorities which govern the audited entity.

Compliance audit is concerned with:

(a) Regularity- adherence of the subject matter to the formal criteria emanating from relevant laws, regulations and agreements applicable to the entity.
(b) Propriety- observance of the general principles governing sound financial management and the ethical conduct of public officials.

While regularity is emphasized in compliance auditing, propriety is equally pertinent in the publicsector context, in which there are certain expectations concerning financial management and the conduct of officials.

or

Commission Paid to Insurance Agents: It is a well-known fact that insurance business is solicited by insurance agents. The remuneration of an agent is paid by way of commission which is calculated by applying a percentage to the premium collected by him. Commission is payable to the agents for the business procured through them and is debited to Commission on Direct Business Account. There is a separate head for commission on reinsurance accepted which usually arise in case of Head Office. It may be noted that under section 40 of Insurance Act, 1938, no commission can be paid to a person who is not an agent or intermediary of the insurance company.

The auditor should, inter alia, do the following for verification of commission-
(i) Vouch disbursement entries with reference to the disbursement vouchers with copies of commission bills and commission statements.
(ii) Check whether the vouchers are authorised by the officers-in–charge as per rules in force and income tax is deducted at source, as applicable.
(iii) Test check correctness of amounts of commission allowed.
(iv) Scrutinise agents’ ledger and the balances, examine accounts having debit balances, if any, and obtain information on the same. Necessary rectification of accounts and other remedial actions have to be considered.
(v) Check whether commission outgo for the period under audit been duly accounted.

6.b

Restrictions on Investment of funds of a Central Cooperative Society: 

Provisions of the Central Act put some restrictions on investments of funds of a Central Cooperative Society. 

According to Section 32 of the Central Act, a Central Cooperative Society may invest its funds only in any one or more of the following:
(i) In the Central or State Co-operative Bank.
(ii) In any of the securities specified in Section 20 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.
(iii) In the shares, securities, bonds or debentures of any other society with limited liability.
(iv) In any co-operative bank, other than a Central or State co-operative bank, as approved by the Registrar on specified terms and conditions.
(v) In any other moneys permitted by the Central or State Government.

The principal provision relating to the investments of funds of a co-operative society, the Central as well as State Acts does not mention anything about the investment of reserve fund outside the business specifically.

6.c.

Not guilty, 

Members of the Institute in practice who are otherwise eligible may practice as advocates subject to the permission of the Bar Council but in such case, they should not use designation ‘chartered accountant in respect of the matters involving the practice as an advocate. 

In respect of other matters they should use the designation ‘chartered accountant’ but they should not use the designation ‘chartered accountant’ and ‘advocate’ simultaneously.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

All MCQs CA Course - May 2019 Paper with Changed pattern

Hello everyone, following are various Multiple choice questions from different subjects. I Hope you will like it Happy reading Section Z - ISCA MCQ and Important One Words Paper 6: Information Systems Control and Audit (Old Course) Official ICAI MCQ 1. Arrange in chronological order of their assessment. a. Risk b. Threat c. Vulnerability d. Impact (a) a,b,c,d (b) c,b,a,d (c) d,c,b,a (d) c,b,d,a 2. Complete the sentence. "_______ " is not a RISK management strategy. (a) Define (b) Eliminate (c) Share (d) Mitigate 3. COBIT 5 principles include all except, (a) Meeting Stakeholder Needs (b) Covering Enterprise End To End (c) Separating Governance From Management (d) Enabling Better Controls 4. Creating a Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) framework is responsibility of ____________. (a) Management (b) Auditors (c) Board of Directors (BoD) (d) Auditor and BoD 5. Best definition to define a HUMAN being in terms of System. (a) Physical, Prob

Suggested answers November 2018 - Advance accounting Old Course IPCC

November 2018 Following are answers, a care is taken to answer them correctly, however, if any mistakes are identified by you, kindly share with me, I would love to hear them and will incorporate changes accordingly. Question Covered in post 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), 1(d), 2, 3(a),  3(b), 4, 5(a), 5(b),  6(b), 7(a), 7(b), 7(c),  7(d), 7(e) Question Pending 6(a) 1(a) (i) Annual lease rent = Rs. 32,500 (ii) Income = 26,000, 32,500, 39,000 (iii) Depreciation = Rs. 20,000, Rs. 25,000, Rs. 30,000 1(b) (i) Prior period Item adjustment Prior Period A/c Dr. To Salary Payable Salary payable A/c Dr To Cash Prior period item shall be disclosed separately (ii) Wages with retrospective effect It is not taken as error or omission in the preparation of Financial statements and hence this is not a prior period item, additional liability of Rs. 75,000 shall be included in current year Salary 1(c) (i) Present obligation as a result of a past obligating ev

Similarities between Delhi and Sikkim

 Delhi and Sikkim are although very different in terms of culture, tradition and food however both have some similarities. The first similarity is the area, both Delhi and Sikkim are small where as Sikkim ranks twenty seventh in terms of covered area and similarly Delhi ranks thirty first in terms of covered area. There is high literacy rate in Delhi and Sikkim, Delhi literacy rate is 86.21% and Sikkim's literacy rate is 82.6% which is also thirteenth in rank. Delhi and Sikkim have high human development index, Delhi ranks Fifth with 0.746 HDI and Sikkim ranks tenth with 0.716 HDI. Both Delhi and Sikkim comes in Northern portion of India and shares almost same latitude. Both Delhi and Sikkim are great heritage of culture and language hub.